Category: Reviews

  • Book Review: Starship Troopers

    These days, many people know Starship Troopers from the 1997 movie. However, that movie satirized the famous science fiction Hugo award winner written by Robert Heinlein, a naval engineer. This space tale is known for its militarism and, to some critics, repugnant due to its harsh view on society, human nature, and life. I found its social commentary thought provoking, even if Heinlein’s military background is evident throughout the novel.

    Voting, its requirements and consequences, is part of the novel’s philosophical discourse. Only veterans are allowed to vote in Heinlein’s society because only veterans are citizens. The protagonist, who joins the military against his wealthy family’s wishes at the beginning of the book, is told by his father that voting is “vain and useless,” and he wishes his son would go into business instead. Heinlein writes that people who are given the right to vote instead of earning it don’t value things, and that’s one reason why democracy failed (America in this novel has already fallen). The best things in life are beyond money and paid for with agony, sweat, or with life itself. Better to have someone who decided to enlist to gain the right to vote than to merely give the right to those who won’t appreciate voting’s consequences. At one point Heinlein describes civilians as “beans,” an example of why critics criticize Heinlein’s work as adulating militarism.

    Punishment is another topic Heinlein discusses. There’s no mental insanity defense to crime, “We shoot mad dogs, don’t we?” opines one teacher. Heinlein writes that children not being punished led to democracy’s failure because schools turned into violent places and juvenile offender’s names not published to avoid shame. In Heinlein’s opinion, pain is evolution and life’s main survival technique, and punishment should be unusual lest it serve no purpose.

    Worth mentioning is Heinlein idea of a “cultivated conscious.” He writes that at birth humans have no moral instinct. Morality must be learned and the basis of all morality is duty. At one point Heinlein criticizes Plato’s Republic, so Starship Troopers has plenty to keep a reader pondering about, much of it deeper than expected from the book’s cover or that satirical 1997 movie.

    Starship Troopers plot is rather straightforward. The character development is limited and few characters stand out except to serve to illustrate Heinlein scrutinizing paradigms. Don’t expect memorable dialogue, though do expect interesting conversations. A reader gains a better appreciation of the physiological and psychological requirements necessary to train and survive combat, and the mindset Heinlein thought necessary to those who serve their country through armed combat. One deserved accolade is that Starship Troopers was the first story to describe a human combat suit, called the Marauder Suit, that led to countless usages in sci-fi, like Metroid, Halo, Half-Life, and Fallout. The book is short with simple prose and easy diction. Check it out if you want an old school viewpoint on matters you may not have thought about and you have a flare for space combat.

  • Book Review: Hyperion

    This science fiction tale by Dan Simmons won the Hugo Award. It also inspired a few
    character names in the famous video game StarCraft, and because I’m a fan of that game I
    wanted to check out Hyperion after a friend recommended it. If you enjoy creative works with an
    interplanetary universe set in the 29th century, pick this book up.


    I can safely say that this book kept me reading late into the night. Simmons does a good
    job using foreshadowing to give the reader just enough information to leave them begging for
    more. If you are looking for beautiful prose or memorable sentences, this novel may fall short.

    That said, Simmon’s knowledge of science is blended well into the story and helps believability
    flow into the space age concepts. L’m no astrophysicist, so I appreciated Simmon’s ability to
    weave such concepts into the story without taking away from the character development or plot.
    The characters include an atheistic “Consul,” a Muslim colonel, a Jewish scholar, a
    Catholic priest, an almost hedonistic poet, and (IIRC) an agnostic female detective. Simmons
    plays with the concept of religion in a futuristic world, with more religious allusions to the Jewish
    and Catholic characters. Such religious play does not get in the way of the story and I only
    mention the faiths because Simmons chose to. Enjoy trying to figure out why.

    The storytelling is interesting. The main plot is spun in between the characters each
    telling a story from their past, with the goal of understanding what each will “wish” of a homicidal
    entity known as the Shrike. Each story is a long chapter and gives insight into why each
    character is making a deadly pilgrimage that only one may return from. While a new writer may
    find this structure difficult to achieve, I especially liked the priest’s chapter as it is written in
    journal fashion, which I find compelling in Hyperion for the same reason as in the first half of
    Dracula.

    Overall, this is a great story with compelling characters and plenty of mystery. Be warned
    that there is a sequel, The Fall of Hyperion, so don’t expect to walk away with closure and all
    mysteries solved. That’s part of the fun.